Check with relevant some ideas from urban and rural sociology
The Hong Kong businesswomen mentioned above wanted their femininity, maybe not their ability to imitate the behaviour of these male colleagues, to be respected (Hills, 2000). If they need to achieve this they have to start with revolutionising the discourse of these everyday lives and their workplaces. Which means “”fighting”” must become “”discovering””, and “”goals”” or “”victories”” must become “”answers”” or “”solutions””. The ways in which discourse must change are numerous as the types of structures, cultures and techniques in which they operate. It’s not through the appreciation of female faculties that the discourse and structures, cultures and techniques of this workplace will become less coercive and less divisive; it really is through discourse that female faculties can come to be appreciated and structures, cultures and techniques of this workplace will end up less coercive and less divisive. It really is, among other items, from discourse that dominant masculinity came to predominate, and it’s also, among other items, through discourse so it may be abated. Inside the compass with this paper it really is discourse this is the root as well as the reason behind the problem, maybe not the symptom as well as the outcome.
Critically assessed, it is often shown that the initial statement may be too optimistic. Collinson and Hearn’s (1996) view that dominant masculinities are precarious due to their inherent division and competitiveness seems at first sight to be reasonable, although this are illusory. Examination of the converse situation, that of a hypothetical consensual and trusting masculinity, reveals that, conceptually at the very least, masculinity’s divisions and competitiveness can be expected plus in this it finds some sort of unity, thus calls into question the legitimacy of Collinson and Hearn’s (1996) conceptualisation of this problem. That’s not to state that a challenge cannot successfully be manufactured. The normal shortcomings of previous challenges are which they all suffer with faulty signification, having originated externally or having become externalised. The suggestion manufactured in the context with this paper is for the task to reach your goals it must originate in discourse. The power of discourse as being a support to dominant masculinities has been shown, therefore it is really not unreasonable to suppose that a similarly rooted challenge could have comparable power and succesful outcome. The main element to success, nonetheless, is that the challenge must start out with discourse and be – and remain – wholly internal. Previous challenges developed their discourses but these were weak because of the emergence from externalised agendas: these people were effortlessly limited by their scholastic, political or feminist original locus. To reach your goals and all-embracing in both the workplace and wider society, the agenda must emerge from discourse, maybe not vice versa, and must encompass all areas of the public and private spheres.
Barrett, M. (1998) “”Stuart Hall”” in Stones, R. (ed.) Key Sociological Thinkers, pp. 266-278, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan
Blackburn, R.M., Browne, J., Brooks, B. and Jarman, J. (2002) “”Explaining gender segregation”” in British Journal of Sociology, 53(4), pp. 513-536
Cockburn, C. (1991) into the Way of Women, Basingstoke: Macmillan
Collinson, D. and Hearn, J. (1996) “”‘Men’ at ‘work’: multiple masculinities/multiple workplaces”” in Mac an Ghaill, M. (ed) Understanding Masculinity: Social Relations and Cultural Arenas, pp. 61-76, Buckingham: Open University Press
Crompton, R. (1997) Women and Work in Modern Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Deal, T. and Kennedy, A. (1982) Corporate Cultures: the Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Harmondsworth: Penguin
Goodwin, J. (1999) “”Gendered work in Dublin: initial findings on work and class””, CLMS University of Leicester Working Paper, (24), [online] available at https://lra.le.ac.uk/bitstream/2381/8583/1/working_paper24.pdf, accessed 30th September, 2015
Hakim, C. (1996) Key Issues in Women’s Work: Female Heterogeneity as well as the Polarisation of Women’s Employment, London: Athlone
Hills, K. (2000) “”Women managers’ workplace relationships: reflections on cultural perceptions of gender””, CLMS University of Leicester Working Paper, (26), [online] available at https://lra.le.ac.uk/handle/2381/8566, accessed 30th September, 2015
Humphrys, J. (2004) Lost for Words, London: Hodder & Stoughton
Johnson, C. (1996) “”Does capitalism absolutely need patriarchy? Some old dilemmas reconsidered”” in Women’s Studies International Forum, 19(3), pp. 193-202
Kendall, L. J. (2008) The Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival: An Amazon Matrix of Meaning, Baltimore: The Spiral Womyn’s Press
Pateman, C. (1988) The Sexual Contract, Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Potter, G. (2000) The Philosophy of Social Science, Harlow: Prentice Hall
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997) “”Discourse as conversation in society”” in Van Dijk, T. A. (ed) Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 1-37, London: Sage
Warren, K. J. (1989) “”Rewriting the long run: the feminist challenge to the malestream curriculum”” in Feminist Teacher, 4(2/3), pp. 46-52
Wright, J. (1898) English Dialect Dictionary, Oxford: Henry Frowde
,
To export a mention of the this article please decide on a referencing stye below:
If you should be the original composer of this essay and no longer wish to have work published regarding the UKDiss.com internet site then please:
Relevant Services
,
Our scholastic writing and marking services can help you!
Related Lectures
,
Study for free with your array of university lectures!
,
Looking for a flexible role?
are you experiencing a 2:1 degree or maybe more?
Research Resources
,
Free resources to work with you along with your university studies!
We’ve received widespread press coverage since 2003
Your UKEssays purchase is safe so we’re rated 4.4/5 on reviews.co.uk
All work is written to order. No plagiarism, guaranteed in full!
We’re here to answer any questions you have got about our services
Copyright © 2003 – 2020 – UKEssays is just a trading name of All Answers Ltd, company registered in England and Wales. Company Registration No: 4964706. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ.
*You also can browse our support articles here >
“
2607 words (10 pages) Essay
1st Jun 2020 Sociology Reference this
Disclaimer: This work was submitted by way of a university student. This is simply not a typical example of the work created by our Essay Writing Service. You can view types of our professional work here.
Any viewpoints, findings, conclusions or suggestions expressed in this material are those of this authors and never fundamentally reflect the views of UKEssays.com.
Do the urban and rural spheres remain socially distinct in virtually any methods? Check with relevant some ideas from urban and rural sociology.
Sharma (1997 p. 74) states that rural and urban communities form the ‘end points into the continuum of human being habitats’. Nonetheless, it has in addition been suggested that the social, cultural and technological developments in britain (UK) have triggered a country wide urban society, with limited sociological distinctions involving the two geographical places, by way of a means of urbanisation. The remit with this assignment is always to discuss this further, and certainly will reference various theoretical contributions to support or contradict this argument. Also, certain reference is going to be built to the thought of communities as well as the essay may also explore social relations from both the urban and rural perspective.
If you’d like assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to simply help!
If sociology could be the study of society as well as its social dilemmas, rural sociology focuses predominantly upon the existence of these within rural environments, usually emphasizing the countryside (Karalay 2005 p. 3). Peggs (2012 p. 89) proposes that in Britain we usually perceive the countryside to be a ‘rural idyll’, a view that will be premised upon the reduced crime rates, observed continued existence of community and kinship ties and a lesser population density. Nonetheless, Pugh and Cheers (2010 p. viii) declare that such perceptions usually cause clear generalisations and a failure to acknowledge the diversity amongst villages, suggesting that this is of rurality itself is frequently flawed due to its presumption that all area holds homogenous faculties. This stereotypical view of rural society being harmonious in addition has resulted in a failure to discover the impact of industrialisation upon the sociology of agriculture, as well as the isolation usually experienced by adults in remote rural areas (Scott 2014 p. 656). The former refers to the impact that technological advancements experienced upon the practice of agriculture, or the Agricultural Revolution. Whilst this has somewhat increased the talents of farmers to aid a more substantial amount of people and created a surplus of this option of food, especially in Western areas, it has in addition impacted upon weather change and employment rates in rural areas (Volti 2011 p. 6).
Whereas, urban sociology is certainly caused by from the structure of a city or town along with the social conversation involving the people that live there (Peggs 2012 p. 90) and possesses been suggested that towns and cities will be the ‘physical embodiment of political and economic relationships; hence, an exponential focus was placed upon urban societies by sociologists as well as the government (Flanagan 2010 p. 3). Browne (2005 p. 389) defines urbanization while the ‘process of this movement’ of men and women from rural areas across to towns with towns and cities becoming the major centres of population. Whilst it’s connected with being exceptional regarding the modern world post the Industrial Revolution, Wagner (2008 p. 6) notes that is has also caused a number of ‘new’ dilemmas; including pollution as well as the negative impact so it has received upon the environmental surroundings, medical issues specially within lower socio-economic groups, and country wide inequality. Although urban communities are fundamentally developed from rural habitats, there exists a range ‘glaring differences in all facets of life’ (Sharma 1997 p. 74). As an example, the distinctive faculties of an urban society is noted being the ‘substitution of secondary for primary contacts’; the weakening of kinship; decline into the role of this family members; lack of neighbourhood and community; plus an ‘undermining of this old-fashioned basis of social solidarity’ (Lin and Mele 2012 p. 39). As an example, Flanagan (2010 p. 175) argues this one of this significant reasons for migration to rural areas is definitely, and stays to be, economic incentive and Sharma (1997 p. 76) proposes that urban societies are becoming more meritocratic, offering its citizens the chance to reach their full potential, suggesting that rural areas are premised upon a normal value system that offers little room for change.
Louis Wirth (1938) recognized the defining faculties of a city as being population size and density in addition to social diversity; proposing that the blend of hence have triggered a ‘distinctive urban life-style’ (Fulcher and Scott 2011 p. 475). Wirth’s theory has been noted to be always a seminal piece speaking about urbanisation, proposing that he perceived this to be a thing that would spread to all or any areas; fearing that it was a ‘socially disruptive’ process, a danger towards the moral values of citizens, that will cause a lack of community and ‘underlying consensus’ (Slattery 2002 p. 303). Furthermore, he perceived urbanism as being separate from reports of capitalism, industrialism or modernity and did not acknowledge exactly how such ideas are intertwined and dependent of each and every other (Magnusson 2013 p. 55).
Tonnie’s (1957) analysis of this impact of this industrial revolution advised that the disruption brought on by people moving towards the city generated an increase in ‘large-scale, impersonal, calculative and contractual relationships’; at the expense of community (Hillyard 2007 p. 7). His theory contained a comparison between gemeinschaftlich, communal solidarity, and gesellschaftlich including relations of calculative and contractual natures, and is usually critiqued as a result of his depiction of historical communities to be romantic and ideal (Scott 2007 p. 780). Similarly, Simmel (1903) proposed that there were significant differences within human being conversation in city life when compared with rural areas, suggesting that folks are more likely to be emotionally reserved and individualistic, proposing that the development of such skills permits them to ‘cope aided by the multiple demands of urban life’ (Stolley 2005 p. 169). He advised that urban life makes citizens ‘bombarded’ with ‘images, impressions, sensations and activities’ resulted in them becoming blasé and disinterested with others, exacerbating the emotional distance between on their own among others (Giddens 2006 p. 896). That is further discussed by Furedi (2013 p. 319) that the ‘veiled hatred and contempt’ for the current industrial society resulted in Tonnies work usually being disputed due to its generalised nature.
This change in the socially cohesive nature of pre-industrial society had been also discussed by Emilie Durkheim (1897), nonetheless, his work had not been solely from a pessimistic perspective and he argued that this is merely a change in the social bonds and relationships (Hillyard 2007 p.10). He argued that urban-adults are more likely to become less linked with the ‘common concern’ and develop an interdependence premised upon an organic solidarity; in which, ‘social ties depend on differences’ (Stolley 2005 p. 169). He felt that modern society had been in relation to ‘the ideals of modern individualism’, with concerns as to whether this might supply a enough foundation for society, nonetheless, felt that communities could possibly be re-established on different grounds (Challenger 1994 p. 211).
Community is just a multi-dimensional term that may reference a physical invest which people live together but in addition to ‘groups of men and women whose conversation just isn’t predicated on physical proximity but shared interests’ (Robinson and Green 2011 p. 13). The thought of community is frequently compared inside the urban-rural continuum, with Mann (2003 p. 190) supporting the theoretical perspective that urbanisation has triggered a loss in community, as well as the values which can be connected with it. Also, Fulcher and Scott (2011 p. 475) proposed that the weakening of relationships in city life is amongst the key factors why urban-adults are a lot more likely to have mental health issues, commit suicide or become victims of crime. Yet Browne (2005 p. 393) argues that the close knit community in rural areas can actually be extremely ‘narrow minded and oppressive’; proposing that folks who’re different to the majority, and sometimes even would not have family members ties aided by the area, will tend to be excluded. That is further supported by Lister (2010 p. 203) who notes that whilst any community provides protection for a few, this could be done so in line with the exclusion of others; reiterating so it can not be seen as an ‘organic homogenous entity’. Nonetheless, Abrahamson (2013 p. 55) argues this one of this key good reasons for the focus upon urban development is community planning, wanting to alleviate the dilemmas from the lack of community in towns by wanting to adjust the structure, provision and resources to enforce these.
Lin and Mele (2012 p. 39) suggest that the adult urban population are notably less likely to be unemployed as a result of the range jobs available, also suggesting that city life itself ‘discourages’ unemployment as a result of lack of support while focusing upon individualism. Yet Ferrante (2013 p. 252) argues that difficulties with the rural aspects of a country tend to be under exaggerated or ignored: as an example, she notes that a large percentage of young ones that live in poverty reside in rural areas; noting the consequences of economic restructuring, decline of farming and old-fashioned industries as well as the lack of enough support in these areas. That is further discussed by Pugh and Cheers (2010 p. xvi) who remember that assumptions premised upon the idealised nature of this rural induce a ‘comparative invisibility’ of social dilemmas which are in the same way likely to take place here as in urban societies, such as for example poverty, domestic violence and substance misuse; proposing that often the needs of rural-adults are mainly ignored by state provision. Furthermore, Betti and Lemmi (2013 p. 36) argue that whilst statistical evidence may indicate that rates of poverty are somewhat higher in metropolitan areas and towns, they explain this by the somewhat higher population density, an increased cost of staying in such areas, as well as the exponential costs of getting or renting accommodation in the centre of a city. Also, whilst poverty is frequently perceived as becoming an inner city problem, it really is found widely in rural areas with farm workers being amongst the lowest paid in society by having a loss in their work also potentially leading to homelessness and eviction (Browne 2005 p. 393).
Paddison (2001 p. 12) argues that there has changed into a decentralisation, aided by the intertwining of town and country, causing a country wide urban society and a rural sociology becoming less relevant today. That is further maintained by Fulcher and Scott (2011 p. 471) who remember that the differences involving the two communities have ‘largely disappeared’ due to both of those now being ‘shaped by the dynamics of consumer capitalism’. Although Browne (2005 p. 389) argues that considering that the 1960’s the UK has reversed a number of the changes made through the industrial period, with more and more people choosing to reside in the countryside. That is specially relevant within areas which are within commutable distance to major towns and cities, as a result of high costs of staying in the towns and cities along with the perception that rural areas are somewhat better for raising young ones. Also, Pugh and Cheers (2010 p. 6) argue that technological advancements, including the internet, have further perpetuated the decentralisation of urban life, with communication somewhat increasing in even the most remote areas; enabling visitors to have ‘easier and more reliable usage of information and services’. Nonetheless, Flanagan (2010 p. 176) reports that there is a failure to produce rural areas sufficiently, causing high urbanization rates leading to unemployment and housing shortages in large towns and cities; questioning or perhaps a rate of urbanization was ‘beneficial or detrimental to economic growth’.
Having less community life in urban environments is frequently cited as being one of many key distinctions between rural and urban sociology, and would denounce the that rurality lacks relevance in a post-modern society. Nonetheless, technological advancements, including information communication technology and transport and the like, have generated more individuals choosing to reside in rural environments and commuting with their employment on a daily basis. This assignment has discussed both sides of this argument, with reference to a number of theoretical contributions, including Wirth, Durkheim, Tonnies, and Simmel; every one of which focus on the impact upon social relations into the city. Nonetheless, it has also highlighted a number of the social dilemmas which are indiscriminately impacted upon by location. The assignment has plainly supported the perception that there is a decline into the relevance of rural sociology considering that the Industrial Revolution, nonetheless, it offers yet to reduce all credibility no matter what the developments manufactured in a postmodern society.
Betti, G. and Lemmi, A. (2013). Poverty and social exclusion. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Browne, K. (2005). An introduction to sociology. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
Challenger, D. (1994). Durkheim through the lens of Aristotle. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society. Ny: Free Press of Glencoe.
Ferrante-Wallace, J. and Caldeira, C. (2014). Seeing sociology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Flanagan, W. (2010). Urban sociology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Fulcher, J. and Scott, J. (2011). Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Furedi, F. (2013). Authority. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
Hillyard, S. (2007). The sociology of rural life. Oxford: Berg.
Karalay, G. (2005). Built-in way of rural development. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.
Lin, J. and Mele, C. (2005). The urban sociology reader. London: Routledge.
Lister, R. (2010). Understanding theories and ideas in social policy. Briston: Policy Press.
Magnusson, W. (2011). Politics of urbanism. London: Taylor & Francis Routledge.
Mann, P. (2000). A procedure for urban sociology. London: Routledge.
Paddison, R. (2001). Handbook of urban studies. London: SAGE.
Peggs, K. (2012). Animals and sociology. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pugh, R. and Cheers, B. (2010). Rural social work. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Robinson, J. and Green, G. (2011). Introduction to community development. L . A .: SAGE.
Scott, J. (2014). A dictionary of sociology. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sharma, R. (1997). Urban sociology. New Delhi: Atlantic Pub.
Slattery, M. (2003). Key ideas in sociology. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
Stolley, K. (2005). The basic principles of sociology. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Tönnies, F. (1988). Community & society. New Brunswick, N.J., U.S.A.: Transaction Books.
Volti, R. (2008). An introduction towards the sociology of work and vocations. Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press.
Wagner, L. (2008). Urbanization. Ny: Nova Science Publishers.
,
To export a mention of the this article please decide on a referencing stye below:
If you should be the original composer of this essay and no longer wish to have work published regarding the UKDiss.com internet site then please:
Relevant Services
,
Our scholastic writing and marking services can help you!
Related Lectures
,
Study for free with your array of university lectures!
,
Looking for a flexible role?
are you experiencing a 2:1 degree or maybe more?
Research Resources
,
Free resources to work with you along with your university studies!
We’ve received widespread press coverage since 2003
Your UKEssays purchase is safe so we’re rated 4.4/5 on reviews.co.uk
All work is written to order. No plagiarism, guaranteed in full!
We’re here to answer any questions you have got about our services
Copyright © 2003 – 2020 – UKEssays is just a trading name of All Answers Ltd, company registered in England and Wales. Company Registration No: 4964706. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ.
*You also can browse our support articles here >
, “
1300 words (5 pages) Essay
1st Jun 2020 Sociology Reference this
Disclaimer: This work was submitted by way of a university student. This is simply not a typical example of the work created by our Essay Writing Service. You can view types of our professional work here.
Any viewpoints, findings, conclusions or suggestions expressed in this material are those of this authors and never fundamentally reflect the views of UKEssays.com.
One of the best challenges for social policy in Britain was to encompass minority ethnic groups, plus in many methods it offers did not accomplish that. Bochel points out that for quite some time social policy has been reluctant to acknowledge ethnic diversity, going to be universal in character, therefore the dilemma of battle is certainly over looked. This has had a significant impact on minority ethnic groups while the discrimination that they most definitely suffer into the labour market plus in town will not be precisely addressed. Research has shown that women and men from ethnic minority groups are doubly likely to be unemployed as white Britons, as well as other social indicators echo this pattern. Ethnic minorities may also be prone to undertake low-paid, low-skilled work, as well as the vicious circle that stems with this – inferior housing, poorer living requirements, and substandard schools in deprived areas – is clearly partly brought on by the welfare state system, which institutionalises this discrimination. The unique dilemmas faced by ethnic minorities should be addressed independently, and until recently social policy has did not try this. Also, the increased exposure of tackling crime which includes underpinned New Labour’s social policy and that of this previous Conservative governments has impacted on ethnic minorities as a result of usually discriminatory nature of initiatives to cut crime. The ‘stop and search’ programme is unfairly targeted toward black young ones, towards the level that many believe being black is tantamount to a social problem (McGhee, 2005). Such flaws in British social policy have truly contributed to a growing sense of isolation amongst ethnic minority groups, and so maybe it’s argued that social policy is frequently more dangerous than beneficial.
If you’d like assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to simply help!
Considering that welfare states are typically associated with left of centre governments, as well as the supposed hostility of conservative right wing parties toward high quantities of state intervention, the definition of ‘conservative welfare states’ seems somewhat of an anomaly. Nevertheless, you can find definite samples of conservative states that not only keep from fighting the welfare state but actually encourage the dependence of citizens regarding the government. This is often traced back once again to the Bismarckian ‘corporatist’ system of 19th century Germany, in which it absolutely was regarded as into the interests of this state to provide for the welfare of its citizens. This sort of welfare state (in its extreme type) is less about reducing inequality and increasing citizens lives than it really is maintaining the status quo – a hierarchical system based on a culture of dependence (Esping-Anderson, 1990). Conservative welfare states tend to be religious and/or nationalist in nature, by having a strong increased exposure of family members values. Epitomising such faculties is arguably George Bush’s current reign. Despite initial cuts in public areas expenditure, government spending has actually increased faster under Bush than it did under Bill Clinton, having an increase of very nearly 33%. The religious part of Bush’s conservative system is illustrated with reference to his 2001 pledge to offer huge amounts of dollars to faith-based charities. Accepting the inevitability of ‘big government’ ( and so the conclusion of Conservative emphasis on cutting spending), the republican government under Bush has prioritised public spending partly in accordance with religious preferences. Therefore, a ‘conservative’ welfare state is the one which makes use of welfare as being a control system, to advance a certain means of thinking – as an example religion, nationalism – on its citizens.
The 1970s undoubtedly marked a watershed in British history with regard to the welfare state; nonetheless, to claim that yesteryear 30 years has witnessed a roll-back of this state and a decline in public areas spending are at most readily useful too simplistic as well as worst incorrect. In fact, research shows that from the late 1970s, public spending as being a proportion of GDP has remained fairly stable. Thatcher undoubtedly espoused the merits of tiny government and individualism and bemoaned the high quantities of government spending from the economic crises regarding the 1970s, nevertheless the welfare state had become entrenched in British society, practically towards the point of no return. There have, though, been significant changes in the application of public spending, as governments were forced to re-prioritise spending (Alcock et al). For example, paying for education has increased into the past 30 years, whereas the Conservative and New Labour governments have attempted to tighten their budgets into the part of income support via an escalation in means testing for benefits. NHS spending in addition has increased significantly under Labour following a 1999 Comprehensive Spending Review, by more or less 4.7% annually (Alcock et al). Eventually, governments into the past 30 years have strived to boost the efficiency of public services, and this has accounted for the changes in the application of public social expenditure.
Though it is very important never to forget the pre-1940 foundations upon that your welfare state had been built, one cannot deny that the welfare state was most fully realized in Britain between 1940 and 1970. Building regarding the strong sense of collectivism that characterized the war years, the general public while the government alike reached the consensus that state intervention had been essential to make certain that Britain would fulfill its full economic potential. It really is widely regarded that the next policies stemmed from a mix of the economic philosophy of John Maynard Keynes as well as the social philosophy of William Beveridge. The fact a simple framework of social policy emerged for the first-time had been distinctive as it complemented the political and economic liberties afforded to citizens from the turn of this century. More over, it represented the beginning of a rights-based citizenship in Britain (Alcock et al). It absolutely was also effortlessly the first-time since the development of political parties that the common good of the nation prevailed over partisan differences. Asa Briggs’ classic essay identified three principal components of the welfare state which were distinctive from the pre-war period. Desire to was to make sure the guarantee of minimum standards (including income), social protection by hawaii in some instances of need as well as the provision of services at a maximum level (Briggs, 1985). Another distinctive factor had been that this protection was to be universal – unlike the poor legislation of this Victorian times, usage of welfare was to be ‘free at the point of delivery’ for several, minus the stigma previously attached to welfare support.